Skip to main content

Real Homesteader or Facebook/Youtube Homesteader

Are you seriously considering "homesteading?" I am talking about raising a family on a meaningfully productive piece of land—because that is "homesteading." Single people or childless couples living on a half acre of ground with a dozen chickens, a garden, and a goat might well be admirably defined as an attempt at "radical simplicity"—but it is not "homesteading." And look, I highly advocate for radical simplicity. But the fact of the matter is that people angling in that direction are really tourists. They are not making a serious commitment. In my experience, they are either young and extremely fickle—and they will be onto the next virtue signal any moment—or they are at the end of their lives (over 50 and often pulling a check from the government) and have few other choices. That is not a judgment. This is an attempt to frame a discussion that might lead to successful action over the long term. Homesteading is for families and is measured in generations. Radical simplicity is a very temporary lifestyle unless it is wrapped around a family homestead. If you don't have a family and don't plan on raising a family and are not particularly interested in conquering the world then radical simplicity is a reasonable strategy and lifestyle.

How do I know this? Because I live in a region with the largest population of real homesteaders in the U.S. I have seen many failed homesteads and I have seen many successful homesteads. The failures were undercapitalized, started too late, and had no plan for the next generation. The successful homesteads started young, built a family operation, and planned for the future. You can start homesteading later in life, but you must make up for the time you lost with cold, hard cash. All real homesteaders know this.

Let's start from the beginning. The most important crop on a homestead is grass. Homesteads require livestock, and livestock requires forage and hay. In our region, a cow/calf pair needs a minimum of two acres of excellent grassland, three acres of good grassland, or ten acres of scrub to make a living. A workhorse needs a little more ground. And pasture ground is not hay ground.

To make hay, you need hayfields and haymaking equipment. You need a place to store the hay. And you need to be in the kind of physical condition that can pick up 800, 50lbs bales of hay, load them on a trailer, lift them onto a hay elevator, and then stack them in the barn. This would exclude 99% of Americans over the age of 25. Homesteading is not the same thing as homemaking.

If you are interested in real homesteading and would like to visit our community leave a comment.

Here is a video clip of our haymaking equipment and operation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEFCy5a2gMA



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taking Action: The Home in Homesteading

A homestead is a home. This simple fact is overlooked by essentially all of the homesteading books, websites, and social media homesteading groups.

A homestead needs a real homemaker and she is the bedrock of her family and the home. The family needs a provider who does the heavy work around the homestead and brings in an income. This does not preclude the homemaker from actively bringing in an income, but it does preclude the homemaker from a 40-hour a week job and 10 hours per week commute. An individual leaving the home at 8am and returning at 6pm cannot possibly make a home or raise a family. No home and no family means no homestead. It means debt and wage slavery until you have accumulated enough assets to reach escape velocity—usually right about the age (and body weight) where you are no longer capable of doing anything. This is the corporate employment trap. I know it is harsh. Real life is like that.
Because, in reality, "homesteading" is merely the resettlement of …

When It's Real

In a real, cooperative, and interdependent community ("CIC"), a failure of one family causes great harm to all. When you rely on each other, a failure pulls everyone down, and it is for this reason that the successful CIC's have rules—and all of the failed communes and rebellious minded communities have long since circled the drain. Successful communities are comprised of people who bring something to the table, and the most important thing that they can bring is a future.

This is not to say that communities cannot be formed around an ethos other than religion. Secular cultural norms, ethics, and expectations could work just as well. The Quakers had incredibly successful communities—both economically and politically—while rejecting dogma and eschewing creeds of any kind. Emphasis on "had". The Quakers gave America and the world the ideas of Liberty and the sovereignty of the individual, and then most of their communities fell apart for reasons I shall discuss a…

The Economics of a Real Homestead

In the real world, there are facts—even in a world with a thousand shades of grey. These facts govern—and people who can accurately interpret the environment in which they find or place themselves in will have greater success and better outcomes than people who do not. The resettlement of the American countryside, what some people have taken to calling "homesteading," is governed by a set of environmental facts, and no amount of feel-good propaganda is going to have any impact on this set of facts.

This article is directed at people who have amassed hard-won resources and capital and are considering moving from the suburban model of living to the American countryside.

First, don't listen to the media. While it is true that most (there are plenty of wealthy landowners and businesses) of rural America is a disaster zone of government dependence, addiction, and obesity, disasters create opportunity. There are winners and losers in this environment, just as there is in urban…