Skip to main content

When It's Real

In a real, cooperative, and interdependent community ("CIC"), a failure of one family causes great harm to all. When you rely on each other, a failure pulls everyone down, and it is for this reason that the successful CIC's have rules—and all of the failed communes and rebellious minded communities have long since circled the drain. Successful communities are comprised of people who bring something to the table, and the most important thing that they can bring is a future.

This is not to say that communities cannot be formed around an ethos other than religion. Secular cultural norms, ethics, and expectations could work just as well. The Quakers had incredibly successful communities—both economically and politically—while rejecting dogma and eschewing creeds of any kind. Emphasis on "had". The Quakers gave America and the world the ideas of Liberty and the sovereignty of the individual, and then most of their communities fell apart for reasons I shall discuss at another time while their Pennsylvania neighbors and fellow "Plain People," the Amish and the Mennonites, thrived.

The members' of social media "Homesteading" groups talk endlessly about canning, gardening, and chickens—all minutiae that have essentially nothing to do with running a successful family homestead. Youtube is filled with people sharing the opening scenes of their (soon to be failed) "homesteading journey," but not one of these has a track record of success. They are not homesteading. They are budding filmmakers. And that's OK—if you are interested in being a filmmaker. (This is not a critique of the Rocky Mountain states homesteaders. That is a version of "homesteading" that I don't have a good feel for as it is not centered on agriculture.)

I say this because the ideal presented, and rightfully so, by the social media and youtube homesteaders cannot be achieved outside of an interdependent and cooperative community. You will need help from your neighbors, and they will need help from you. And if there are any aging political activists or social justice warriors in a community, that community is doomed. A community must be self-reinforcing. That is, it must produce children who are raised with an ethos of commitment to the community, not a commitment to move to New York City and become a childless, but wealthy, investment-banker/fashion designer/interior decorator/actor (or to San Francisco to be an angry social justice warrior—same outcome). As if wealth or fame or social justice could buy immortality! If the children are raised with the attitude of "getting out of here," there will be no community in short order. We are all mortal and will eventually be returned to the very earth that we, as homesteaders, have tilled and worked. The community ethos must be one of cohesion—not politics. No community can survive identity politics, victimhood, and gender warfare. And no family can live as we do without a community.

Modernity has convinced people to make staggering sacrifices, or engage in staggering consumption activities, that will only result in the end of their family line. Talk about self-destruction. About a third of my American contemporaries never had any children. Half of those who did have children will not have grandchildren. Think about that for a moment. But they did get one of their kids into an Ivy League school so that they would become "successful" and live in a place like this where there is nothing to do but watch TV and take anti-depressants and maybe play golf on the weekends, so they got that going for them.

Here's a photo of a family homestead where the ethos was "up and out." The former occupants never had grandchildren. Their children were too busy being "successful" or fighting for social justice, and now the only thing left to show that this family ever existed are the stones and mortar of these chimneys. Memento mori.

A real homesteader must be part of a real family within a real community, with real children, real productive adults, and real elders who contribute to the wellbeing of the family—not looking for a photo-op of a J. Crew-pretend-life before heading back into a bottle of anti-depressants (or gin).

Imagine a CIC that started out with a dozen loosely defined social justice warrior "families." No children, but lots of protesting and angst, where the average age is 45. In no time the place will be a nursing home, not a homesteading community, with a population of government dependent elders in need of drool cups and bedpans. And I know that all of this is powerfully offensive to middle-aged, childless gender warriors and political activists. Such people are anathema to a CIC. Unfortunately, the majority of the members of the social media "homesteading" groups fall into this category, and they do their absolute best to censor this debate and the ideas presented here. I am sure that they don't even know they are harming others with their actions and activities. That is one of the great paradoxes of modern politics. It is the do-gooders who do the most harm. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."

Horsedrawn cultivator.

Cultivating the garden in early spring.

Raking hay.

If any of this rings true and you think you might like to live and raise a family in this manner, please reach out to me. You can find me at my author's page on FB here, or leave your email address on my website,

"Unlike the suburban model, the homesteading lifestyle cannot be characterized as a search for convenience, but, paradoxically, on balance it really is a much more pleasant lifestyle than one that is packed with florescent lights and labor-saving devices, features a long commute and a tight schedule, and is lived in constant fear of inconvenience. The homesteading lifestyle provides for peace of mind, robust health, freedom from debt and freedom from control by outsiders. We have found that by rejecting many of the supposedly time and labor-saving devices and schemes we have gained more free time and the ability to lead a far less frenzied life."

From my best-selling book, "Prosperous Homesteading," available on Amazon.

My latest novel, "Seven Years of Famine," is available on—and it will rock your world.


Popular posts from this blog

Taking Action: The Home in Homesteading

A homestead is a home. This simple fact is overlooked by essentially all of the homesteading books, websites, and social media homesteading groups.

A homestead needs a real homemaker and she is the bedrock of her family and the home. The family needs a provider who does the heavy work around the homestead and brings in an income. This does not preclude the homemaker from actively bringing in an income, but it does preclude the homemaker from a 40-hour a week job and 10 hours per week commute. An individual leaving the home at 8am and returning at 6pm cannot possibly make a home or raise a family. No home and no family means no homestead. It means debt and wage slavery until you have accumulated enough assets to reach escape velocity—usually right about the age (and body weight) where you are no longer capable of doing anything. This is the corporate employment trap. I know it is harsh. Real life is like that.
Because, in reality, "homesteading" is merely the resettlement of …

The Economics of a Real Homestead

In the real world, there are facts—even in a world with a thousand shades of grey. These facts govern—and people who can accurately interpret the environment in which they find or place themselves in will have greater success and better outcomes than people who do not. The resettlement of the American countryside, what some people have taken to calling "homesteading," is governed by a set of environmental facts, and no amount of feel-good propaganda is going to have any impact on this set of facts.

This article is directed at people who have amassed hard-won resources and capital and are considering moving from the suburban model of living to the American countryside.

First, don't listen to the media. While it is true that most (there are plenty of wealthy landowners and businesses) of rural America is a disaster zone of government dependence, addiction, and obesity, disasters create opportunity. There are winners and losers in this environment, just as there is in urban…