Skip to main content

Homesteader or Off-Grider

Someone recently asked me, "what is the difference between 'Homesteading' and 'Off-Griding.'"

I have to tell you... that question really stumped me. So rather than just provide a flippant answer off of the top of my head, I spent a little time and did some research (as best I could online and using my own voluminous experiences and contacts), and I think I have an answer. A terrible, unpleasant, and brutal answer:

"Homesteaders" are families who have enjoyed some success within the system and have been able to figure out how to acquire productive property, equipment, implements, and tools and have put all of this to profitable use. They also appear to be almost exclusively married couples with children. My sense is that these people put their family and children ahead of the nonsensical drama of politics, activism, and protest. They make the world a better place by caring for their family and living in Community with their neighbors.

Self-described "Off-Griders" have, IMHO, reached the end of their rope and have lost all patience with the complexities of the current social construct. And they appear to me to be willing to forgo all social status just to get that monkey off of their back, including living in vans, RV's, cabins, tents, yurts, and under bridges. Off-Grider's appear to be almost exclusively young single men. I am certain that these people really wish events and circumstances were different. I am also convinced that this demographic has always had difficulty with the constraints of the current construct, did their best to fit in and follow the rules, sit still in class, and walk between the lines. The crushing confines of modern existence were not something they were ever going to be compatible with. In another era, these would have been the pioneers who crossed oceans and mountain ranges to improve their lot. Unfortunately, there are no frontiers left.

THAT IS NOT CRITICISM. IT IS ONLY AN OBSERVATION. I feel nothing but sadness and sympathy for people suffering under the burdens of (too much) complexity. Jordan Peterson, the famous psychologist, and best selling author, once said that mental illness is a weakness in a person that bulges out when the complexity of their life becomes too much to bear. I have written about the rewards, Truth, and beauty of the Quaker testimony of Simplicity often. Unfortunately, there is an expiration date for getting things done within the confines of the reality of the human lifespan. Children must be born in our youth, or we risk dying before they are established as fully functioning adults. Major life milestones must happen on time. 30 is far too late to start a career (there are exceptions; especially for the truly gifted); 40 is too late to start a family. Not everyone is going to make it to 70. I speak from personal experience: older parents, for the most part, are going to be a burden on their children unless they are very wealthy. And they will not be of any assistance to their grandchildren. The corporate/institutional employment system does not tell you this as it is not in their best interests. As far as they are concerned you are a drone and a taxpayer. They can import other people's children (immigration) to replace you when you age out of the system.

Here's another thing I have concluded: There are hundreds of thousands of Off-Griders and precious few REAL homesteading families and communities occupying rural America outside of the Anabaptist communities. I think the reason for that is pure economics. It doesn't cost a thing to go "Off-Grid." It takes years of work and saving to accumulate the resources to buy, stock, and operate a homestead for people who followed the standard advice for life advancement. It is much easier for people who learned a marketable skill in their teens and early 20's and started making and saving money while starting a family and who developed lots of practical skills at a young age.

Here are some photos I found online. In this case, I think a picture is worth a billion words.


Photo of an "Off-Grider's Cabin" taken from a popular off-grid FB group. THOUSANDS of people liked and commented positively on this living arrangement.

Close up, complete with a dirt floor.

(Compare this photo of an "Off-Grider's" dwelling to the photo of the Prosperous Homestead in an Amish community attached to this post.)

A member of one of the "Off-Grid" FB groups thought enough of their outdoor cooking station to post this. Does anyone think that a wife and mother would find this arrangement an acceptable level of provisioning by a man for his family? Or the dwelling above? Of course not. Hence my assertion that these are all (very lonely) single men.


So how do people (the American Anabaptist Communities) who stopped going to school at age 14 invariably achieve serious prosperity while providing for the demands of a large family?

That was rhetorical.

The answer has four primary components:


1: The men became responsible MEN in their mid-teens with the benefit of a proper role model.


2: The women shape the children; not the public school system.


3: They have a FAMILY.


4: They have a COMMUNITY and live in cooperation and interdependence—not collectively.

















#Homesteading, #Off Grid, #Self-Sufficiency, #Debt Free




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taking Action: The Home in Homesteading

A homestead is a home. This simple fact is overlooked by essentially all of the homesteading books, websites, and social media homesteading groups.

A homestead needs a real homemaker and she is the bedrock of her family and the home. The family needs a provider who does the heavy work around the homestead and brings in an income. This does not preclude the homemaker from actively bringing in an income, but it does preclude the homemaker from a 40-hour a week job and 10 hours per week commute. An individual leaving the home at 8am and returning at 6pm cannot possibly make a home or raise a family. No home and no family means no homestead. It means debt and wage slavery until you have accumulated enough assets to reach escape velocity—usually right about the age (and body weight) where you are no longer capable of doing anything. This is the corporate employment trap. I know it is harsh. Real life is like that.
Because, in reality, "homesteading" is merely the resettlement of …

When It's Real

In a real, cooperative, and interdependent community ("CIC"), a failure of one family causes great harm to all. When you rely on each other, a failure pulls everyone down, and it is for this reason that the successful CIC's have rules—and all of the failed communes and rebellious minded communities have long since circled the drain. Successful communities are comprised of people who bring something to the table, and the most important thing that they can bring is a future.

This is not to say that communities cannot be formed around an ethos other than religion. Secular cultural norms, ethics, and expectations could work just as well. The Quakers had incredibly successful communities—both economically and politically—while rejecting dogma and eschewing creeds of any kind. Emphasis on "had". The Quakers gave America and the world the ideas of Liberty and the sovereignty of the individual, and then most of their communities fell apart for reasons I shall discuss a…

The Economics of a Real Homestead

In the real world, there are facts—even in a world with a thousand shades of grey. These facts govern—and people who can accurately interpret the environment in which they find or place themselves in will have greater success and better outcomes than people who do not. The resettlement of the American countryside, what some people have taken to calling "homesteading," is governed by a set of environmental facts, and no amount of feel-good propaganda is going to have any impact on this set of facts.

This article is directed at people who have amassed hard-won resources and capital and are considering moving from the suburban model of living to the American countryside.

First, don't listen to the media. While it is true that most (there are plenty of wealthy landowners and businesses) of rural America is a disaster zone of government dependence, addiction, and obesity, disasters create opportunity. There are winners and losers in this environment, just as there is in urban…